Podiumsdiskussion: Stem Cell Research. Regulatory and Ethical Challenges at the Threshold of Application

Am Mittwoch den 26. April 2017 findet am Münchner Kompetenzzentrum Ethik (MKE) der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München von 17:00 bis 20:00 Uhr eine Podiumsdiskussion mit Kurzvorträgen der ReferentInnen zu regulatorischen und ethischen Herausforderungen translationaler Stammzellforschung statt. Konferenzsprache ist Englisch.

Talks:
European Regulations and their effects on clinical trials

Christine Hauskeller, Philosophy and Sociology, University of Exeter; Member of Zentrale Ethikkommission für Stammzellenforschung (ZES); Principle Investigator BAMI EU-FP7: Ethical Harmonization in European Clinical Trials

Balancing Social Justice and Risk Management in the Regulation of Clinical Stem Cell Research
Achim Rosemann, Social Anthropology, University of Warwick; Postdoctoral Researcher at the Bionetworking in Asia Project; Co-Developing the Research Cluster on Life Sciences, Society and Education at Warwick

tba
Klaus Tanner
, Theology, University of Heidelberg; Chairman of ZES; Principle Investigator in the BMBF-project The Patent System as a Medium of Ethicisation and Politicisation of Stem Cell Research

tba
Zacharias Kohl,
Senior Physician, Department of Molecular Neurology, University Clinic Erlangen; Principle Investigator in the Bavarian Research Network Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (ForIPS)


Interdisciplinary Panel Discussion with all Speakers:
Stem cell technology is rapidly moving into applications with large numbers of ongoing clinical trials, experimental medical treatments and uses of stem cells for pharmaceutical tests. The emerging clinical and commercial application challenges regulatory agencies worldwide. Among those challenges are international harmonization or standards, the formation of different marketing practices, and disagreements about evidence criteria between lab and clinical researchers. The guidelines for safe clinical translation by the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) have been criticized as impeding rapid progress because they prescribe time-consuming and costly procedures and built upon the infrastructure provided by big pharmaceutical companies, disadvantaging other routes to clinical innovation and poorer countries. There is huge diversity in how governments implement international standards and adjust them to local conditions and needs. A complex web of regulations must be navigated to avoid over-regulation and allow enough flexibility for local economic and scientific development. The tensions between ethical, legal and practical demands are the topic of this pubic conference.

AnhangGröße
Panel Discussion Stem Cell Research.pdf794.76 KB